More Pages: Baker Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100


A Little Too Thorough!
A Fantastic ResourceThe Editors are top scholars and leaders in the field.
Comprehensive and Authoritative.

Good for Theology Students of the Restoration MovementThe contributors are known to me either personally or by reputation, a couple having been among my professors. Particularly pleasing were the contributions by these gentlemen, showing great respect for the Word of God and not compromising on the truths this movement has advocated for years. About half of the contributions from the independent Christian theologians were what I would consider edifying. The others show the marks of a general shift away from solid Biblical standards and towards evangelical generalism.
Frankly, the responses provided by the evangelical theologians were sadly predictable.
All in all, this is a good book to purchase if you are a theology student looking to gain insight into current discussions and thought within the movement that some call "Stone-Campbell," but which others of us prefer to refer to as the "Restoration Movement" or "this present Reformation."
Evangelicalism's "wing man"The RM and the evangelical movement (EM) have much in common. As organized, identifiable movements (oxymoron?) in North America, they follow roughly parallel chronologies, springing as they did from the Second Awakening of ca. 1800. The "Stone" in "Stone-Campbell," Barton W. Stone, was one of the organizers of a Presbyterian camp meeting that is known to historiographers as the Cane Ridge Revival. One of the Campbells in "Stone-Campbell," Alexander Campbell, editorially followed the organization of the American evangelical movement early in the 19th century favourably noting points of intersection between it and the RM.
In the 20th century, like so many American Protestant bodies, the RM was split by the modernist-fundamentalist controversy into opposing camps -- one becoming the Disciples of Christ and the other the Independent Christian Churches/Churches of Christ. The editorial flagship of the modernist side, "The Christian Century," was of RM construction, and the first managing editor of "Christianity Today," launched by Billy Graham to lead the other side of the debate, was RM-adherent James DeForest Murch.
Over the past thirty years, many a capella Church of Christ exegetes have joined the Evangelical Theological Society, latterly joined by Independents. Independent leaders have been given prominence in the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association.
Although association between the RM and EM, and Baker's editorial introduction suggest a sort of "harmonic convergence" between the RM and evangelical movement (EM), the papers as published suggest otherwise. Theologically, the papers make clear significant points of divergence between the Princeton Theology-influenced Calvinism of much of North American evangelicalism and the RM on their understandings of conversion, faith, and baptism. Despite Baker's introduction, if one did not know anything of the significant interaction and sharing of resources among the RM and the EM, one might be surprised to learn of it.
A further point of divergence not highlighted is the prominence given to celebration of the Lord's Supper or Eucharist in the RM versus the EM. For the EM, faith and the book are the sole centre of attention and focus. While RM adherents claim the nickname "people of the book," the Lord's Supper is, still, given prominence and celebrated weekly (albeit, sometimes "weakly"). The absence of a paper dealing with differing views of the Lord's Supper is a weakness of the anthology.
That said, Baker does us a service by provoking discussion between two groups with parallel commitments to the book who interact at so many levels. One minor criticism: in his preface, Wheaton College historiographer Mark Noll insists on describing the RM as the "Restorationist Movement" instead of its long-standing appellation, "Restoration Movement." Is this stubbornness or merely an oversight on Dr. Noll's part?
A Helpful and Civil Discussion

A few glowing moments, largely mediocreLong-time Kyle fans will pick this one up out of sheer duty to the man who brought us the hillarious now-classics Why I Hate Saturn and Cowboy Wally Show. However, in an obvious attempt to broaden his appeal, Baker has sacrificed the clever semantics and biting wit that caused us to fall in love with him in the first place.
Much of the art is beautiful, full-color work in which Kyle applies his signature cartoony style. Every 10 or 20 pages, he treats us to a gorgeous pin-up, deftly showing off his astounding skill. Unfortunately, littered throughout are pages on pages of cranked-out sketches with dumped-on color, barely worthy of a concept character-study, much less final art in this otherwise beautiful book. It's far too much visual whiplash, between the lovingly-rendered and the hastily-scribbled, and the storytelling is sacrificed as a result.
Also, Kyle makes poor use of the comics medium, awkwardly bouncing back and forth between illustrated prose and traditional comics conventions. The writing itself resembles the art... wonderful in certain spots, glaringly sub-par in others.
A valiant effort, I suppose, but for my money I'd have preferred a book half the length at twice the quality. Buy it if you must, but don't expect the Kyle Baker brilliance of yesteryear.
Stunning!
Astonishing! Another Breathtaking Triumph!

A Challenging Life!When we visit a museum and see wonderful paintings of striking women, seldom do we think about the conditions under which the art was created. Did the artists and the model have a relationship? If so, what was it? Did they have enough to eat while the work was done? Were they considerate of one another? Was the studio warm or cold? What was the model thinking about as she posed? How had the woman come to model? And so on.
I will never look at another painting or sculpture again of a human model without being filled with such questions, as a result of reaching about the life of Fernande Olivier from her private journal, letters, and memoir as presented in Loving Picasso.
This beautiful, charming woman lived an extremely difficult life. It was so challenging that few could have emerged from such awful circumstances without being distorted in mind and personality. Yet, Ms. Olivier seems to have avoided both, and been a light in the life of her many male admirers, female friends, and an inspiration to Picasso in his most innovative years.
From the book's title, you will think that the material is mostly about the years when Ms. Olivier and Picasso lived together, but that's only about half the book. The book is really an autobiography through the time when the two split up for the final time in 1912.
Readers will be rewarded with many intriguing views of the lives of "starving" artists in Paris, the many distinguished friends of Picasso and Ms. Olivier, and how Picasso changed as he went from an unknown to one of the recognized leaders of avant-garde art along with Matisse.
Having read about Picasso's troubled relationships with other women, I was surprised to see that his relationship with Ms. Olivier was one of the most pleasant and productive connections he had in his life. Certainly, he often chose her as a model for his work, and we will always see her as the young person she was then. Many other details in here will either surprise or shock you about Picasso, and expand your understanding of his creative methods and personality.
One of the most charming parts of the book can be found in the many images of places where she lived, the people she knew, the paintings and sculptures for which she was the model, and her own drawings.
For those who have enjoyed Gertrude Stein's, The Autobiography of Alice B. Toklas, you will probably be interested to know that Ms. Olivier's writing is considered to be a more accurate and complete version of many of the same events. In fact, there is an interesting view of Ms. Stein's apparent efforts to keep Ms. Olivier's writing away from an American audience to preserve the market for Ms. Stein's own writing on this subject.
After you finish this rewarding memoir of a most unique person, I suggest that you think about what the purpose of life is. That's a question with which Ms. Olivier had trouble coming to grips.
Follow your purpose!
some people are just crazy
Picasso and__________. Relationships absurd as his art!This book along with the others read like a three part trilogy - this latest one covering the earliest relationship. The book is very good and seems to be honest. Quite readable.
This book should be on the reading list of anyone interested in probing what the heck Picasso was about. Note that he does not get any less difficult in his relationships!! This book is fantastic to see that Picasso is as childish and monstrous in his early relationships as he is in his later ones!


This was boring!
A Great Book
90210 eat your heart out

Your Basic retelling of Cinderella
An awesome, modern retelling of a familiar fairy tale
Will Ella find happiness?

excellent stories - but not as good as 'Child of Mine'
insightful collection of essays on parenting young childrenAt first I was slightly disappointed because a number of the essays didn't seem to be of immediate interest to me personally, and because this collection did not seem to have the same coherence as the first. But after I began to read, I found myself making little notes of agreement in the margins, underlining sympathetic or insightful passages, and smiling at the experiences similar to my own. Even when an essay was not immediately relevant to me (such as the selections on adoption and raising twins), I found instances of shared experience with the writers, who seemed to be as awestruck and profoundly affected as me by their adventures in parenting.
Oddly enough, in reviewing the book, I found I most enjoyed the selections by the male contributors -- delighted at similarities of common experience and enlightened by the differences -- often told with great humor. So this book also helped me to appreciate the unique experience of fatherhood.
Very enjoyable.
A Necessary Collection

this book is alrightthe only problem is,
are oils ,,,?
and where do i get certain flowers?
also, where in the world can i find a stone with a hole in it!!
and aren't crystals ...?
besides that, the book was good and the spells weren't hard or too complicated.
Funny
Spells for Teenage Witches Reviewed by a Teen WitchBlessings.


THIS is what the Verge has to offer?!?There's a lot of stuff that was left out of the Gamemaster Guide in this (random encounter rules and alien NPC templates), and some equally cool things worth stealing to add to your own campaign (the Externals.) The non-External aliens themselves, however, aren't great: for every one that seems cool, there are a few that are, bluntly, overlookable. The aliens themselves range from neat to virtually plagiarized, and the Alien Compendium leaves you feeling that the Verge has become that much less eye-catching. If your Star*Drive group spends time hopping to all sorts of out-of-the-way places, check this out, but be warned - Alternity has better things than this running for it.
A Decent Collection of Sci-fi CreaturesThis full-color, 128-page volume details 57 organisms from the 18 solar systems of the Verge (an area just beyond the borders of Star*Drive's "civilized" sectors), six sentient species and one laboratory creature of "Old Space" (right, the civilized areas), and six sentient "External" species (from outside the bounds of Galactic society). Five of the entries from "Old Space" will be familiar to any Alternity gamer from the basic books (it would have been nice to pad out the roster beyond two new entries: the laboratory Warbeasts and the insane Cykotek cultists). Plenty of good concepts here and high-quality art. There are a few irritating glitches in the book, such as the authors' unnecessary straining for pseudo-scientific description (sorry guys, arachnids don't have six legs), and a few stinkers, such as the alien koala bears and a picture of an egistron that doesn't match the text. Still in all a nice collection.
Good for Star*Drive and for general Alternity use; a decent idea mine.
--Sharon Daugherty for Skirmisher Online Gaming Magazine
Not quite a compendium

Could Have Been Better
Good value for the money